Palop

Elista написал(а):
любимец НСДАП

Предметно по этому ярлыку отвечать будете, нет?

El día en que Manuel de Agustín jugó al ajedrez con Benavente (II)

...Первым, кто прибыл в Мадрид на турнир из нацистской Германии, был Керес, претендент на звание чемпиона мира и один из трех сильнейших игроков планеты в период с 1930-х по 1970-е годы. Я отправился ждать его на Estación del Norte, — говорит журналист, — и каково же было мое удивление, когда вместо молодого и элегантного эстонского игрока, сходящего с поезда, я обнаружил перед собой офицера СС, который приветствовал меня нацистским зигом, а затем крепко пожал мне руку. Это был Пауль Керес, легенда шахмат, который теперь, под давлением нацистов, сотрудничал с ними, как и два его товарища - Бринкман и Земиш, прибывшие на следующий день на турнир в Мадриде, чтобы напомнить Алехину, что Германия все еще сильна, и он ей кое-что должен.

Мне пришлось немедленно отправить Кереса в швейную мастерскую, поскольку это было слишком необычно для "нейтральной" страны, которая только что вышла из гражданской войны. Керес был евреем, но об этом никогда не писали, и никто в послевоенной Испании об этом не знал. Когда мадридский турнир закончился, Кересу пришлось вернуться в Польшу, а Алехин предпочел остаться. Он хотел только играть в шахматы - спокойно, без давления, без шантажа, но это было невозможно.

Агустин, казалось, хотел одним жестом руки стереть все горькие воспоминания о друге. Все, чего он хотел, — это остаться в Испании и уехать через Эшторил или Касабланку в Америку, как и многие другие беженцы. Но смерть пришла, когда он был уже близок к своей цели.

Palop
Дорогой Элист, почему Вы предали своих хозяев Киппура и Кирсана?

А по Моисеичу какой расклад для сравнения предложите?

Lest I be misunderstood, let me add a few words about Mikhail Botvinnik. I got to know him personally quite well in his late 70s, in the last years of his long and eventful life. I can testify that Mikhail Moiseyevich left a very deep impression on me by his human warmth, modesty and asceticism. I would even say that Botvinnik was the only top player who made me envy and wish for myself some of his human qualities. And this admiration of mine had nothing to do with chess.

Botvinnik is often criticized as some kind of "staunch communist", "Stalin’s henchman" or perhaps even a "puppet" and subservient "sycophant", who obediently provided a sort of propagandist “window dressing” for a terrible GULAG regime, being "submissively compliant" with all its crimes. They say today all kind of nasty things about Botvinnik as being the "oppressor" and "tormentor" of the Babylonian players like G. Levenfish, D. Bronstein or even M.Tal.

Some of that might be true but in this particular case like in many others we have a reflection of a general phenomenon of the incredibly hypocritical modern “criticism of Stalinism”. As a rule this vituperation comes from the circles and individuals still much inferior from the moral point of view to the object of their hatred. And in fact the “moral indignation” of these critics is more aimed against a few positive aspects of the Stalinist regime than its many disastrous and inhuman flaws.

Perhaps Botvinnik lacked cultural sophistication, his political views on the “communist past” were sometimes naïve and scientifically unsustainable in many respects. But it is very easy to understand why: he received technical education and worked very hard on chess all his life. No one is as easily manipulated and deceived as the technicians, brought up in the spirit of the Marxist “self-sufficiency” and materialistic dogmatism. Rabbis know it quite well because they have designed this whole system of manipulation.

Botvinnik was brought up in the suffocating atmosphere of slavery, of aggressive soviet propaganda and intensive Talmudic Marxist brainwashing, with no access to truthful information about the nature of the pathological processes in the country. With that kind of oppressive vigilance and systematic disinformation, it was extremely difficult for anyone to raise above the level of intellectual mediocrity. (Exactly the same “socialist” system of disinformation is now operative in the Western media, with one loadable exception of a few internet channels.)

In his case it was almost impossible due to the tremendous attention, support and incessant eulogy he was receiving from the true Talmudic sycophants of the regime. Who could have resisted it?

Despite all this, Botvinnik was a man of convictions all his life and he didn’t betray them – he lived in accordance with his ideas of social justice even though these ideas were very incomplete and brought to life by dangerous utopian reduction of human essence and aspirations to the most basic materialistic needs.

Soviet brainwashing machine

Still I must say Botvinnik was an extraordinary human being with strong moral kernel and this is something that his modern critics lack completely. As a rule they are corrupted to the very core or perhaps even worse than that – they lack any core at all. Talmud is their "soul".

Botvinnik could be manipulated and perhaps even coerced into some kind of reprobate behavior (or much more likely - reprobate inaction). The modern ones simply do not recognize their behavior as shameless and ignominious by any kind of criteria. They are so “nice” and “politically correct”. They lack completely the ability of objective self-evaluation.

The top players of modern times as a rule are true golem and gollum-like monsters, accomplished Satanists. They are the true heirs and products of Leninist, T(a)rotskyist and Stalinist regime. They are Itzhak’s Luria’s dream made our nightmare.

So if you make me choose between Botvinnik and the most vociferous of his “democratic” critics among western chess journalists or grandmasters of younger generation (even leaving Kirsan, Kippur and Kapparos aside as the extreme cases of mental corruptness) I would prefer to stay with Mikhail Botvinnik.

The chess world in general is the world of mediocre personalities and disproportionately inflated egos. It’s hardly surprising because chess is the game of the Babylonian satanists par excellence. If chess has become nowadays synonymous with corruption, it is by no accident. The modern chess personalities are being carefully bred and selected by the rabbis, like cattle, - in the direction of maximum opportunism, intellectual shallowness and human meanness.

At the later stage of his life Botvinnik was the least satanic of them all, the least Babylonically “Jewish”, the most authentic and human. And it is the tragedy of modern times that the noble and straightforward characters like his are being systematically replaced by the rabbis with more and more sleazy and degenerated ones. This is one of the reasons why the return to “Stalinist regime” is not possible anymore. That regime with its millions of innocent victims was still too “benign” for the talmudists’ perverse palate.

I would even say that Botvinnik was too excellent a human being for our times. He couldn’t have adapted to it. And he is the chess personality who would have come first to my mind if I were to seek some support of top professional players in the WPC’s fight for disqualification of the cabbalistic chess cheaters and fraudsters. I have no such illusions about the modern “champions” and “elite-players”.

M. Botvinnik’s book "Half a Century of Chess" dedicated to me by the author himself: "To my friend Valery with a kind request not to read this book! 22-09-92"

Henry Makow is right: the humanity is satanically possessed. And the origin of this possession is the Babylonian Talmud and Chaldean kabbalah.

Palop
Йа плакалъ. ''Понять и простить'', а то как же!